In Southwest Florida the challenge seems to be in limiting the growth to what can be sustained by infrastructure. More and more we hear about large developments being planned but, where are the plans to expand the water supplies, the road networks, the school system or even jobs for the newcomers?
We have to trust that out elected representative will be there to control this growth, and keep it at a manageable level.
Then there is, as the real-estate people say, location, location, location, which of course means where they build. In the area near where I live the question has come up about Toxic materials in the ground that were left over from landfills. This is the in area of the old Foxfire Golf course, where Medallion Homes will be building the Waverley subdivision.
Medallion Homes is owned by Carlos Beruff, who is running for the Senate, and who was appointed to the SouthWest Water Management District by, I believe Charlie Crist, and then, some time later, resigned from that with his last official act being to OK the plans by one of his fellow developers, even though, as reports say, various boards recommended against it.
He has also had problems with Chinese Drywall which was put into a large portion of the homes he build… The Rip Off Report has this to say. When the question came up about remediation he said the cost would break the company, and refused to do it.. The Sarasota Herald Tribune has this to say.
To further muddy the waters the area they are building on, at the future Waverley site has a number of unlined landfills, which the county would rather not test, even though there have been indication that toxic chemicals, may be able to spread in the water table..
If you are curious about this, and want to know just what the fuss is all about, then you should go to the Foxfire West site and see what they have to say. From where I am sitting it looks to me that the developers are winning and the people getting sick, both of it and from it.
Now I have singled out Carlos Beruff but, I am sure he is not the only one who gets away with pulling tricks. Like developers who lay waste to wetlands but to stick more houses into an area.
To give you an example.. This Blog, as the title says, is “My View of the World by Joe” and as such it is my view of things based on how I perceive them… I will admit that I am not a journalist. I do not go racing out to the news so that I can ask people questions, such as “how did you feel when you saw the man murder your daughter/son/husband/wife/brother/sister/whatever”… What I will do is read up on it and then give my view, based on my perception, of what is reported, and then try to make sense of it, and maybe ask a few questions…
Maybe I will get you to change your perception of things, and maybe I won’t but, either way I hope to get you thinking about it..
Most of my material, as you may have noticed, comes from the Sarasota Herald-Tribune at HT.com and my favorite source for thought is from Tom Lyons… both are rather liberal, though he seems to have more common sense that the average liberal..
So, today I want to talk about the two party system that we have, and how they are perceived…
Since this article is about perception I will not try to convince you that these accusation are anything more than SOMEONES PERCEPTION.
First the Democrats….
Democrats are often seen as trying to make themselves more appealing to the criminal element and illegal immigrants by continually trying to give illegal immigrants rights and privileges reserved for legal immigrants and citizens… making it easier for people who are not supposed to be here in the first place to get social services, vote and go to our schools.. In some states people with out documents can even get special driver’s licenses. The Democrats continue to tell us that it is wrong to make someone prove they are themselves, by use of a picture I.D. , when they go to vote in an election… Think about the number of places you have to show an I.D. to do, or get, such as the Pharmacy, travel through an Air Port, getting money from the bank, or to cash a check at the store.
Some people would go so far as to tell you that since we have Law Enforcement agencies to protect us there is really no need for us to own firearms, and that the 2nd Amendment to the U.S. Constitution
means that the right to bear arms is reserved for the government.. The myth of “to serve and protect” started by the Los Angles Police Department has been busted by a number of Police Chiefs who have said tha the purpose of their departments is NOT to protect us from crime but to response to criminal acts… They advocate the creation of more Police type organization, armed of course, that will have heavier and heavier firepower than the citizens.. If you don’t believe me just look up how many organizations have police powers.. I was surprised to find out that is some larger cities the Post Office has uniformed police patrols… The POST OFFICE? I was watching the Animal Planet on Comcast one day… There were armed officers getting in cars clearly marked ASPCA… They have Police powers?
Check out the number of Police Departments in New York City where they seem to have a cop for everything.. Sanitation Police anyone.. Do they shoot the people who litter or don’t recycle?
All of this is really a matter of perception but it does some times seem that the left is trying to give more rights to the people who are not supposed to be here by taking them away from those of us who are here legally…
Now for the Republicans…
They talk about people taking responsibility for their actions and how it is up to the individual to make his way in the world… not the governments job… This is often seen as an attack on the poor. The Republicans are more inclined toward free enterprise with the idea that the government is responsible for helping people create their own wealth and by not giving it to them.. When President Obama talked about the man who had his own business, and how he had done it himself, he put his foot in his mouth, maybe he just did not say it the way he ment to, by saying that man had not done it by himself as the government had made the roads and all those things that helped him build up that business… If you watched the video of his speech President Obama seemed to be saying that the Federal Government did all the things that allowed him to build his company.. Like what? The Roads? Even the Interstates are not build by the Feds.. Sure the Federal agencies put the roads on a map but they give this map to the states who obtains the needed land, purchase the road beds, and then hire private contractors to build the roads that the people pay for with the federal gas tax, which the Feds had out like it was THEIR MONEY. It would not be the job of the Federal Government to make his company for him but, they should at least be able to help keep a business landscape that enable him to build up that company.. himself.
When it come to business interest the Republicans are seen as caving in to the interest of BIG BUSINESS, sometime to the detriment of people’s interest. Down here there is a constant fight between people who want to have controlled growth, so that we do not out build the roads, water, or services, and the people who want to just allow builder to put anything anywhere..
If you listen to some Republicans you will hear about how to current government regulations hinder the various corporations in the conduct of their business.. Take the Deep Horizon disaster, or the recent financial collapse.. Both of these were covered by government regulations but both happened, and that includes the great PONZI scheme of Bernie Madoff, while government was supposed to be watching but wasn’t. So before was talk about cutting back on the regulations, some of which are there to ensure a safe environment, lets make sure the regulators are doing their jobs with the tools they have…
So, yes, this is about perceptions.. There are, as the saying goes, three sides to any story.. Mine, yours, and the truth. It is up to us to discover what that truth really is and the make sure we elect people who are more interested in our interest than they are at getting re-elected.
It is afterall a Government “by, of, and for THE PEOPLE“, not “by, of, and for THE CORPORATIONS”.
For those of you who actually read my articles: I thank you very much…
I love hearing from people who give me the idea that they have REALLY read my material.
On the other hand, there are those who write generic praise which, most likely, is a result of cut and paste and could refer to anything… I particularly liked the one that put a comment on my “About Me” page that said something along the lines of “this is a great idea, I never would have thought about it like that”.
While I look forward to your comments: if the comment does not indicate you have read the articles then I will DELETE it…
It is Primary day here, and here I sit trying to think of whom to cast my vote for.
The first one I crossed off my list was Newt Gingrich… I would have to say that my choice there was only partially religious… He cheated on 2 out of 3 of his wives, and that is just what we know of…. I am not a right wing Christian wingnut, so why do I say my choice is partially religious? Maybe Newt was married in front of a Justice of the Peace and the word “God” was never mentioned, in which case maybe he did not LIE to Jehovah. Then again… I believe they still say things like “in the eyes of God”, or “before God”, so, as far as we know, Newt has lied to Jehovah God at least twice. Then how are we supposed to trust what he says. So he is out.
Mitt Romney : Newt has pointed to Romney’s control of the Damon Corp. and it’s large fines for ethics problems, and Newt would know about ethics problems, having be bounced from the House Speaker jobs for his problem. One that even a Republican Majority could not ignore. So the question about his comes down to the amount of control that Romney had over Damon. Was he doing day to day control of the company, or was his interest just in getting it into shape to sell. At Bain the idea was to take companies that were not making money, on the virge of failure, and turning them around. When he was in charge of Damon, I don’t know how familiar he was with that operation or if he know that those practises, the ones that resulted in fines, were wrong, or if he was just getting rid of dead wood. Newt makes it sound like Mitt was running thing on a day to day operation, rather then getting it ready for resale. The whole idea that Bain could get a company, that was not performing, ready to be bought by another company and not hack off the parts that were not making money is rather strange. After all, if you were looking to buy a company would you rather buy a healthy company or a company that was only standing up because of crutches? Would you pay more for the healty company, or the one you would have to fix? Me? Not that I would ever have to make the choice, I would rather buy a company that I did NOT have to fix.
People will, it seems, look at these question through the filter of their belief: is Mitt Romney honest, or is he a greedy slug who just wanted to cheat medicare. Mitt said he was one of the people who helped clean up the mess at Damon but, no one else seems to know about anything he did to fix anything. Again, it is hard to decide this question. It seems to me that either the Feds thought that he had nothing to do with it, as I don’t know of anything they have charged him with, or if they just could not prove charges and so did not level any.
Ron Paul : He is a libertarian, which means he is not a big government liberal, and he is not a big bussiness syncaphant. People would either love him, or hate him. Ron Paul would probably get rid of a number of government agencies that DON”T carry their weight….. One of these would be the Department of Education… how maany schools do they run… and how many teachers do they have?
I would take aim at the guys in charge of the Federal Highway Administration. What do they really do? You think of these guys as the ones who build the Interstates but, the closest they get to this is telling the states where to build the Interstates. If the Feds want to put in a new Interstate they tell the State DOT where to put the road, and the the STATE goes out to get the property, the right of way, and then gets the road built. The USDOT/FHA does not even get it’s feet dirty. They just hand out the money, which they often threaten to withhold if the stated does not pass laws that the USDOT want, but does not have the authority to pass. Take the speed limits. Feds have said that if a state does not have and enforce a speed limit that the FHA likes then the feds will withhold highway funds, so the state can’t build the highways that the FHA wants. This money comes from, at least one source, gasoline taxes. Each state get back a certain about of money, as determined by what the Feds feel is needed. That means that some states will see a less than a $1 comeback for every $1 they send in, while other states will get more than $1 for ever one they send in….
There are any number of ways that we can slime down the government, and do away with departments that just take up space….. Did the Army Corp. of Engineers so such a good job around New Orleans? How about the Securities Exchange Commision investigating Bernie Madoff? How about the guys who were in charge of keeping an eye on the Deepwater Horrizen? The did a BANK UP job.
Ron Paul might just make the world appreciate us more, when he pulls us back into our own borders. Once the worlds whipping boy takes our marble and come home, maybe they will realize just how much they need us. Maybe then they will understand that WE are not the source of THEIR problems…
In the mean time…. I am going for RON PAUL.. I think he will do the least damage.
I was watching one of those anti-Romney adds…. You know the one: they are talking about Mitt Romney and how, they say, the Damon Corp. cheated medicare out of millions of dollars while he was in charge. They show his face on the left side, and as they talk it slowly morphs into Skeletor, uh, no, that’s not right. Yes, its Florida Gov. Rick Scott who face finally emerges..
I read in the paper that our dear Gov. has a %30 approval rating… I wondered, as soon as I had seen the ad just what Rick Scott thought of the idea that his face can be used to scare voters, and small children.
I have always thought that you should give the Devil his due, or in this case the Governor. Somewhere around %20 of FLorida voters put him in office. So when you look around at 100 Floridians in a room think that something like 60 of them did NOT vote for anyone, a little over half of the ones who did voted picked Scott. So a little more than 20 of those people put him into office.
He got into office with the promise of 700,000 jobs being created over, what, 7 years? Where are they?
He has tried to get the legislature to slash laws that govern business, and has found that even some of thosebusiness leaders said those laws were needed. Think about business you deal with where a license is required, and then think of the license requirment, and background checks, being eliminanted.
To give you an example. It was just a few years ago that we heard how Doctors did not want to be subjected to Fingerpring checks like common criminals. Why would we need to know who they were? Why would we need to know he had a license? Maybe because they write prescriptions for drugs, and we don’t want a drug pedler to just move into the state and hide the fact that he lost his license, in the other state, for selling drugs, or presciptions, like a common criminal.
Does your child’s bus driver have a license? Did they lose it in another state? Were they child abusers in that other state? Yes we need those laws that set out what kind of people can hold jobs, and how much they have to know to do that job.
We need those laws just like we need to have local control of zoning requirments, which is one of those thing our Govener would like to do away with.
Now for some of that “the devil his due”. Yes, he has accepted federal funds from program he did not agree with, like the stimulus pack, but, even if the money should not have been spent, it came from our taxes so why should we turn it down just because those people in Washington were just throwing it around like confetti?.
Some people condemed him for not snapping up the funds for the speed rails, at least not right a way. Rick Scott pointed out that he wanted to know that the money promised would really be there. Sure they promised millions of dollars for high speed rail but, promises and acts are two different things. What if we had gone ahead and started on it, and suddenly found that no one had raised the money. Would those organization who were ready to take the money, and build high speed rail, get stuck for a the bill?
Even Scott deserves some credit, though I hope, in the next state election, that the people of Florida would show a little, a let, more interest in who runs the state. In the meantime he keeps his head down, and maybe he won’t do too much damage to our soiled reputation.